|
The Post-American World | 
enlarge | Author: Fareed Zakaria Publisher: W. W. Norton Category: Book
List Price: $25.95 Buy New: $15.46 You Save: $10.49 (40%)
New (49) Used (37) Collectible (5) from $10.38
Rating: 174 reviews Sales Rank: 137
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 288 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.3 Dimensions (in): 9.4 x 6.5 x 1.1
ISBN: 039306235X Dewey Decimal Number: 303.49 EAN: 9780393062359 ASIN: 039306235X
Publication Date: May 5, 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Review Book Description "This is not a book about the decline of America, but rather about the rise of everyone else." So begins Fareed Zakaria's important new work on the era we are now entering. Following on the success of his best-selling The Future of Freedom, Zakaria describes with equal prescience a world in which the United States will no longer dominate the global economy, orchestrate geopolitics, or overwhelm cultures. He sees the "rise of the rest"?the growth of countries like China, India, Brazil, Russia, and many others?as the great story of our time, and one that will reshape the world. The tallest buildings, biggest dams, largest-selling movies, and most advanced cell phones are all being built outside the United States. This economic growth is producing political confidence, national pride, and potentially international problems. How should the United States understand and thrive in this rapidly changing international climate? What does it mean to live in a truly global era? Zakaria answers these questions with his customary lucidity, insight, and imagination.
Thomas Friedman and Fareed Zakaria: Author One-to-One
Fareed Zakaria: Your book is about two things, the climate crisis and also about an American crisis. Why do you link the two? 
Thomas Friedman: You're absolutely right--it is about two things. The book says, America has a problem and the world has a problem. The world's problem is that it's getting hot, flat and crowded and that convergence--that perfect storm--is driving a lot of negative trends. America's problem is that we've lost our way--we've lost our groove as a country. And the basic argument of the book is that we can solve our problem by taking the lead in solving the world's problem.
Zakaria: Explain what you mean by "hot, flat and crowded."
Friedman: There is a convergence of basically three large forces: one is global warming, which has been going on at a very slow pace since the industrial revolution; the second--what I call the flattening of the world--is a metaphor for the rise of middle-class citizens, from China to India to Brazil to Russia to Eastern Europe, who are beginning to consume like Americans. That's a blessing in so many ways--it's a blessing for global stability and for global growth. But it has enormous resource complications, if all these people--whom you've written about in your book, The Post American World--begin to consume like Americans. And lastly, global population growth simply refers to the steady growth of population in general, but at the same time the growth of more and more people able to live this middle-class lifestyle. Between now and 2020, the world's going to add another billion people. And their resource demands--at every level--are going to be enormous. I tell the story in the book how, if we give each one of the next billion people on the planet just one sixty-watt incandescent light bulb, what it will mean: the answer is that it will require about 20 new 500-megawatt coal-burning power plants. That's so they can each turn on just one light bulb!
Zakaria: In my book I talk about the "rise of the rest" and about the reality of how this rise of new powerful economic nations is completely changing the way the world works. Most everyone's efforts have been devoted to Kyoto-like solutions, with the idea of getting western countries to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions. But I grew to realize that the West was a sideshow. India and China will build hundreds of coal-fire power plants in the next ten years and the combined carbon dioxide emissions of those new plants alone are five times larger than the savings mandated by the Kyoto accords. What do you do with the Indias and Chinas of the world?
Friedman: I think there are two approaches. There has to be more understanding of the basic unfairness they feel. They feel like we sat down, had the hors d'oeuvres, ate the entree, pretty much finished off the dessert, invited them for tea and coffee and then said, "Let's split the bill." So I understand the big sense of unfairness--they feel that now that they have a chance to grow and reach with large numbers a whole new standard of living, we're basically telling them, "Your growth, and all the emissions it would add, is threatening the world's climate." At the same time, what I say to them--what I said to young Chinese most recently when I was just in China is this: Every time I come to China, young Chinese say to me, "Mr. Friedman, your country grew dirty for 150 years. Now it's our turn." And I say to them, "Yes, you're absolutely right, it's your turn. Grow as dirty as you want. Take your time. Because I think we probably just need about five years to invent all the new clean power technologies you're going to need as you choke to death, and we're going to come and sell them to you. And we're going to clean your clock in the next great global industry. So please, take your time. If you want to give us a five-year lead in the next great global industry, I will take five. If you want to give us ten, that would be even better. In other words, I know this is unfair, but I am here to tell you that in a world that's hot, flat and crowded, ET--energy technology--is going to be as big an industry as IT--information technology. Maybe even bigger. And who claims that industry--whose country and whose companies dominate that industry--I think is going to enjoy more national security, more economic security, more economic growth, a healthier population, and greater global respect, for that matter, as well. So you can sit back and say, it's not fair that we have to compete in this new industry, that we should get to grow dirty for a while, or you can do what you did in telecommunications, and that is try to leap-frog us. And that's really what I'm saying to them: this is a great economic opportunity. The game is still open. I want my country to win it--I'm not sure it will.
Zakaria: I'm struck by the point you make about energy technology. In my book I'm pretty optimistic about the United States. But the one area where I'm worried is actually ET. We do fantastically in biotech, we're doing fantastically in nanotechnology. But none of these new technologies have the kind of system-wide effect that information technology did. Energy does. If you want to find the next technological revolution you need to find an industry that transforms everything you do. Biotechnology affects one critical aspect of your day-to-day life, health, but not all of it. But energy--the consumption of energy--affects every human activity in the modern world. Now, my fear is that, of all the industries in the future, that's the one where we're not ahead of the pack. Are we going to run second in this race?
Friedman: Well, I want to ask you that, Fareed. Why do you think we haven't led this industry, which itself has huge technological implications? We have all the secret sauce, all the technological prowess, to lead this industry. Why do you think this is the one area--and it's enormous, it's actually going to dwarf all the others--where we haven't been at the real cutting edge?
Continue reading the Q&A between Thomas Friedman and Fareed Zakaria
Product Description
“Zakaria . . . may have more intellectual range and insights than any other public thinker in the West.” —Boston Sunday Globe “This is not a book about the decline of America, but rather about the rise of everyone else.” So begins Fareed Zakaria’s blockbusting bestseller on the United States in the twenty-first century. How can Americans understand this rapidly changing international climate, and how might the nation continue to thrive in a truly global era? Zakaria answers these questions with his customary lucidity, insight, and imagination.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 169 more reviews...
A lucid explication of a complex, global idea January 6, 2009 An intelligent book that looks at trends in globalization, modernization of developing countries, and what it all means to the United States. Zakaria is clearly adept at gathering, processing, and synthesizing vast and seemingly unrelated bodies of information about a subject. I guess that is what makes him such a talented reporter.
At any rate, if you're interested in the significance of China's and India's growth, the ramifications of the communications boom, or how rising and current national powers will interact and relate as power continues to diffuse, you should read this book. I find it fascinating to learn about the interplay of countries and how they affect one another. Questions surrounding modernization - what does it mean, why does it happen, how does it happen, and is it a good thing - have popped in my head from time to time. This book does a superb job of educating me and addressing my curiosity.
Should be required reading for the Obama administration January 6, 2009 Zakaria's book is a very thoughtful, well researched, historically accurate look at how America has responded to internal affairs and world affairs. With an understanding of our own history, it is possible to see a path for America that can move the world.
Zakaria chooses language that is very clear. This is a very readable book.
It should be required reading for every member of the Obama administration at every level.
The Rise of the Rest . . . January 2, 2009 There are few commentators, "speaking heads," who I respect more than Fareed Zakaria. Most have little of value to add to the so called "news" of the day and ask what seems to me to be pretty inane questions much of the time. Zakaria digs in; and this book is no exception to his professional pursuit of a new view.
What I liked most about the book was Zakaria's point that the decline of America, while being exacerbated by some of our choices, is more a result of "the rise of the others." This is not a gloom and doom portrayal of a superpower gone amok as much as it is an explanation of why the rest of the world will be soon getting its chance at growth. While growth of the global economy is not entirely a zero sum game, surely the industrialized nations will need to share the wealth with the up-and-coming nations.
Of course China is a huge economy with which the rest of the global economy must come to grips. America, as always, is dazzled by size and China therefore holds a particular fascination for us. For now, the mutual needs of each country have led to a wise collaboration. Yet, we cannot forget the "old ally," India.
Many visitors consider India to be "not very pretty." Much of the infrastructure of the country is dilapidated and in dire need of attention. India (much like Portugal and Greece) has a GDP Profile comprising 50% service revenues, 25% manufacturing revenues and 25% agricultural revenues. While India is moving forward to address the infrastructure issues, they will hopefully not fall prey to the illusion of its impact on GDP. It may look good for visitors, but it doesn't necessarily add to the GDP and may well add to the overall cost of providing services.
America may still be the world's only superpower for some time to come. It should aggressively plan for the day when the economic power passes to one or several of the main players in the global economy. Meanwhile, we should put our economic house in order and reign in spending beyond our means. We must pay attention to education and raising the next generation of innovators to provide the grist for the global manufacturing mill. We must maintain then extend our lead in being the world's invention machine.
This is a well thought out presentation in clear and concise prose that will be very valuable to anyone dealing in the new global economy. I guess these days, that's just about everyone.
Some interesting points but overall not much substance January 2, 2009 The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria is one of three books I have read recently in order to gain a better understanding of the changes occurring in the world today. By far the best is James Kynge's China Shakes the World. Kynge, a former bureau chief for the Financial Times in China, has lived there since 1982, is fluent in Mandarin and well connected. This is the ONE book to read on China. The Elephant and the Dragon, Robyn Meredith's examination of India and China, is also worthwhile, although somewhat superficial. Meredith, a foreign correspondent for Forbes magazine, gets the big picture right, but is a poor writer and lacks an insiders perspective on these two countries. Zakaria's book is the most ambitious, seeking to cover not just the "big two" but the entire non-American world. He fails for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the fact that 240 pages is not nearly enough to cover such a grand topic (Actually the book is shorter since Zakaria uses a large type and line spacing compared to the other works--30 lines per page versus 33 and nine versus 10 words per line on average compared to Mederith's book) Zakaria is the editor of Newsweek International and as such is as much concerned with political as well as economic issues, thus making his book more subjective than the other two.
The book is described as "The rise of the rest," implying that it is concerned with the rest of the world. But in fact, after a short introductory chapter, there is a chapter on China, one on India, two on the United States...and that's all. Further, Zakaria tries to use numbers to make his points sometimes without effect. For example, in making a claim for the superiority of the American system of higher education as an asset for America he states on page 91, "In India, universities graduate between 35 and 50 Ph.D.s in computer science each year; in America, the figure is 1,000." However, a few pages later (page 198) he notes that foreign students account for "65% of the doctorates in computer science." Maybe they get the degree from an American university, but increasingly Chinese, Indian and other foreign students are taking those degrees back to their native country and using that knowledge to compete more effectively against the U.S. He also writes on page 200 that, "Harvard University's Richard Cooper even argues that the American savings rate is miscalculated, painting an inaccurate picture of massive credit card debt and unaffordable mortgages." Well, we all know how that one turned out! To be fair, Zakaria does admit that America has problems, but he downplays them so much that his whole argument seems specious. Zakaria also makes dubious statements such as, "the United States has better relations with almost all the major powers than they have with each other." France? Russia? In fact outside of the British "lapdogs" America's relations with the other major powers reached rock bottom under Bush over the Iraq War.
But there is value in reading Zakaria's book. For one, he makes points that are generally not realized by most people. To illustrate, he points out that World War II was largely fought and won by the Russians (but it was the Americans and British who claimed the credit). For example at the time the Allies were liberating Sicily from 55,000 Germans, Russia was engaged in the battle of Krusk, the largest battle in history in which some1.5 million Germans and Russians fought. Yet this battle is largely unknown to Westerners. This Western slighting may help to explain Russia's now assertive behavior which demands respect and recognition.
Zakaria also points out that the present time is one of the most peaceful in human history and at the same time one where economic development has grown at an unprecedented pace. Technical advances make it possible for any negative event to get instantaneous and expansive world coverage. Thus a terrorist attack in which a relatively small number of people are killed receives extensive coverage, whereas in the past mass murder such as in Cambodia and the Congo received scant attention. Moreover, while most people are aware of the economic progress made by China, the "Asian Tigers," and more recently, India, Zakaria shows that economies have taken off all over the world--in South America and even Africa. For example, between 1990 and 2007 the global economy grew from $22.8 trillion to $53.3 trillion and global trade increased by 133 percent. Two additional important points are that the U.S. system of education stresses creativity, problem solving and teamwork as compared to rote learning that is prevalent in Asia and other parts of the world and that there is far more conflict in the current U.S. political system as compared to the recent past, less willingness to compromise.
Zakaria's book is also far more politically oriented than the other two. For example his chapter on China stresses the political implications behind China's efforts at international trade. For example, he mentions that China's economic policies toward Africa are affected by the fact that six African countries still recognize Taiwan--and China has its eyes on all that Africa oil. South Africa, for one, switched to support the One China policy as a result of an infusion of aid from China.
At the end Zakaria makes a number of obvious and simplistic suggestions for America's future--have priorities, build broad rules, not narrow interests, be Bismark, not Britain, etc. Finally it is his rah rah America attitude that puts me off. This country has real problems that need hard answers, not a cheerleader. But as Zakaria himself acknowledges, "I came to America as a young man, fell in love with the country, and built a life and family here. Good for him, but such a person is hardly capable of making the kind of hard-nosed, objective assessment of what the world is like today and what America needs to do in response..
A good read that could be better January 1, 2009 I think the title should have been "rising of the others" rather than the post American world. I believe the title was deceptive since it doesn't not start from the fall of the American empire nor it plan counter measuring this "assumed" fall. Mr. Zakaria simply projects the advance of china in the medium term running existing economic data and underestimates India as a rival to America, which I agree too.
If you are a fan of graphs and statistics you won't find any, simply because the author does not provide theories, he just explains whom the rivals would be and how they manage this upcoming confrontation till now.
I gave 4 stars because the style is simple and elegant, and took me only 7 days to read; besides it intelligently connects current relationships between focused players and logically illustrates the backgrounds of their behavior.
|
|
| This amazon.com affiliate Store Owned and Operated by Silkroad Retail Group
Accepted Payment Methods:
American Express, Diners Club, Discover, JCB, MasterCard, Eurocard, Visa, Visa Check Cards, Amazon.com gift certificates, payment directly from your bank account, and checks, money orders, or cashier's checks denominated in U.S. dollars and drawn on a U.S. bank, Borders Gift Cards and Waldenbooks Gift Cards as payment for qualifying orders. More information about Shipping & Handling, Delivery Date, Return Policy, Special Offers/Savings etc is available at the time of Secure CheckOut.
© 2006 ChindiaLounge.com All Rights Reserved | Powered by Silkroad Web
| |